My blog about talking about the world as it is. No mincing of words.
Published on October 18, 2012 By Mmrnmhrm In Fallen Enchantress

It looks like Fallen Enchantress is ready for release. I don't know what differences there are between 0.99 and 1.0 yet but it's probably safe to pass judgment.

So.....

What do you think the Metacritic average of Fallen Enchantress will be by December 1, 2012? Put in your guesses.

Here are some recent game releases to compare to.....

Dishonored 91

XCOM 89

Borderlands 2 89

Torchlight II 89

Transformers: Fall of Cyberton 79

Prototype 2 76

The Sims Super Natural 71

Retro City Rampge 70

 


Comments (Page 2)
9 Pages1 2 3 4  Last
on Oct 18, 2012

83

on Oct 18, 2012

I'd say an 80. Probably not much more.

on Oct 19, 2012

Pointless predicting the score, it will depend heavily on the campaign which we can't judge.

on Oct 19, 2012

I'm new here (just bought the game), and have no right to vote, but review scores are often so insane/paid for/biased that I want to take a shot based on industry assumptions.  Most people here seem to feel like the game is in good shape, so the big question is: will reviewers be rooting for Stardock to pull it together after WoM, will they feel bitter about it, or will they be neutral?  I think the bias will be slightly positive.  Also, I think metacritic is more interesting in terms of the Pro/User voting ratio.  Usually, something is wrong if there's a big difference, though obviously trolling and anti-DRM backlash can affect the results.

My guess:        87/9.1

XCOM              89/8.1

Dishonored       91/8.4

Borderlands 2   89/8.2

Torchlight II      88/9.0

Transformers    79/7.7

Prototype 2       76/6.3

The Sims SN     71/6.0

Retro City R      70/8.9

 

on Oct 19, 2012


I am gonna say 75 to 80

on Oct 19, 2012

83

 

on Oct 19, 2012

74

on Oct 19, 2012

77

on Oct 19, 2012

I'm guessing somewhere between 80 and 85. Niche games rarely get good scores, it's always mass market bullshit at the top.

on Oct 19, 2012

83

on Oct 19, 2012

High 70s... if I had to guess I'd say 77 or so....

I think some of FE's design decisions will irk some reviewers (such as the way research is handled).  I still believe the different game systems feel a bit disjointed and the balancing is not quite there.  Also magic is STILL behind MOM in terms of spell diversity...

on Oct 19, 2012

I'm late, but I'd for 85. The game is too much a niche game to get a 90 plus score. And believe me, every single reviewer will deduct points for the game not having multiplayer. They did this already for GalCiv II and really feel Stardock should have learned and added multiplayer in 2012. I don't agree, but they'll all fall over it! I do happily pay 1$ for added multiplayer though (specifically some form of PBEM).

on Oct 19, 2012

83 - It deserves more compared to other games, which have a 85+. But thats because of all the arguments here (mass market, niche game etc.).

on Oct 19, 2012

I agree

Heavenfall
I'm guessing somewhere between 80 and 85. Niche games rarely get good scores, it's always mass market bullshit at the top.

 

Totally agree. I will say 82 as the middle point.

on Oct 19, 2012

 Niche games can have some advantage because they are generally reviewed much less so less likely to get bizzaro reviews.I think 75-80 is fair because it is a good game but not in the same league as Dishonored or X-Com in my view.

9 Pages1 2 3 4  Last